Mos Steph

I'm a producer with the NPR show Snap Judgment, and the host/creator of the music podcast, Stagedive.
Recent Tweets @imontheradio

humansofnewyork:

Seen in Golden Gate Park

#hosfforever

I tried Snow Ice for the first time!! Its a crazy #azn technology, half shaved ice half ice cream, all soft tastiness!! -.-

humansofnewyork:

“I used to be the only male working on a sex podcast. Every week they’d try to get me to try a new synthetic vagina.” 

(Seen at Facebook HQ)

OH MY GOD HONY FOUND MY FRIEND STEVE!!!!

I want to meet someone perfect in an imperfect way, fall in love, and then tell the story years later on radio shows like Snap Judgement or This American Life. X3 
That’s the type of fairy tale I want.

(via starlightandsnakebites)

Oh my god this is too cute. 

Indeed, this is why women have so many clothes! We need an all-purpose black skirt that does old fashioned, another one to do proper, and a third to do flirty… at the very least… and all in casual, business, and formal. And we need heels to go with each (stilettos = provocative, high heels = flirty, low heels = proper, etc, plus we need flats for the picnics and beach weddings etc). And we need pants that are hemmed to the right length for each of these pairs of shoes. You can’t wear black shoes with navy pants, so you’ll need to double up on all these things if you want any variety in your wardrobe. I could go on, but you get the picture.

Women’s closets are often mocked as a form of self-indulgence, shop-a-holicism, or narcissism. But this isn’t fair. Instead, if a woman is class-privileged enough, they reflect an (often unarticulated) understanding of just how complicated the rules are. If they’re not class-privileged enough, they can’t follow the rules and are punished for being, for example, “trashy” or “unprofessional.” It’s a difficult job that we impose on women and we’re all too often damned-if-we-do and damned-if-we-don’t.

Lisa Wade (via thefemcritique)

Yep, I have clothes I only wear for job interviews & meetings. I don’t even like them, but I know I need them to get ahead in my career.

(via karnythia)

Never really thought about this until I started buying clothes to wear to court. Then I added some shoes to make those court clothes good for nights out, and other shoes to make my casual-but-not-too-casual clothes work appropriate. And then I bought stuff (shoes and accessories) to make my court clothes double as slightly-flirty nights out clothes. (Because my nights out aren’t all that provocative, or super flirty, anyway.) And then I’m staring into my closet like, …Where the hell did all this shit come from?! Here’s the answer. 

(via hoomie)

Also the reason why women will look at what looks like a closet full of stuff and say “there’s nothing here for me to wear”. They really do mean it; there’s nothing there that they can wear that will count as “suitable for the occasion”.

(via malikaeshan)

Not to mention that most women of size that I know, myself included, are constantly fluctuating in size and shape. So even though I have $200 worth of clothes from my job last summer, my hips are wider/waist is narrower/breasts are smaller and a lot of it no longer fits in a way that’s professionally acceptable

(via rockandrollwinterfell)

and then men wanna shit all over women for shopping or owning a ton of shoes

(via tainopunk)

It’s also industry specific.  I’ve worked as a Banker, Traders assistant  and an Accounts assistant and in all of those jobs i’ve had to dress for the job.  I now work in IT and I love it. I work in an office full of guys and not a single one of them gives a shit about what I wear to work. It’s liberating.

(via sweetsyren)

(via tarts)

Mexican spice flavor! P: #larvae

annfriedman:

In my ongoing quest for the perfect framework for understanding haters, I created The Disapproval Matrix**. (With a deep bow to its inspiration.) This is one way to separate haterade from productive feedback. Here’s how the quadrants break down:

Critics: These are smart people who know something about your field. They are taking a hard look at your work and are not loving it. You’ll probably want to listen to what they have to say, and make some adjustments to your work based on their thoughtful comments.

Lovers: These people are invested in you and are also giving you negative but rational feedback because they want you to improve. Listen to them, too. 

Frenemies: Ooooh, this quadrant is tricky. These people really know how to hurt you, because they know you personally or know your work pretty well. But at the end of the day, their criticism is not actually about your work—it’s about you personally. And they aren’t actually interested in a productive conversation that will result in you becoming better at what you do. They just wanna undermine you. Dishonorable mention goes to The Hater Within, aka the irrational voice inside you that says you suck, which usually falls into this quadrant. Tell all of these fools to sit down and shut up.

Haters: This is your garden-variety, often anonymous troll who wants to tear down everything about you for no rational reason. Folks in this quadrant are easy to write off because they’re counterproductive and you don’t even know them. Ignore! Engaging won’t make you any better at what you do. And then rest easy, because having haters is proof your work is finding a wide audience and is sparking conversation. Own it.

The general rule of thumb? When you receive negative feedback that falls into one of the top two quadrants—from experts or people who care about you who are engaging with and rationally critiquing your work—you should probably take their comments to heart. When you receive negative feedback that falls into the bottom two quadrants, you should just let it roll off your back and just keep doin’ you. If you need to amp yourself up about it, may I suggest this #BYEHATER playlist on Spotify? You’re welcome.

** I presented The Disapproval Matrix to the fine folks at MoxieCon in Chicago yesterday, and they seemed to find it useful, so I figured I’d share with the class. It was originally inspired by a question my friend Channing Kennedy submitted to my #Realtalk column at the Columbia Journalism Review.

(via cherylstrayed)

Public radio REPRESENT

Miki Meek, Julie Snyder, Ira <3

nprradiopictures:

wnycradiolab:

Um, guys: public radio temporary tattoos.  Apparently some public radio stations will offer these at pledge drive time.  And WE LOVE THEM.

These are so cool!!!! Another good incentive to donate to your local member station! -Emily

Hahaha caught Ira flipping through these a few weeks ago. So glad they became a reality!!!! I hope my local stations offer them up!